This does not mean confusables.txt is wrong. It means confusables.txt is a visual-similarity claim that has never been empirically validated at scale. Many entries map characters to the same abstract target under NFKC decomposition (mathematical bold A to A, for instance), and the mapping is semantically correct even if the glyphs look nothing alike. But if you treat every confusables.txt entry as equally dangerous for UI security, you are generating massive false positive rates for 96.5% of the dataset.
Chris Aniszczyk CTO, Linux Foundation，更多细节参见搜狗输入法2026
平台提供 非结构化资产智能搜索 能力，用户可通过自然语言或关键词（如“黄色小汽车”“人行横道异常”）进行语义化查询。系统结合视觉识别与文本分析模型，实现对图像内容、视频帧、OCR 文本的深度理解，加速自动驾驶、安防等场景下的数据探索效率。，更多细节参见WPS官方版本下载
Что думаешь? Оцени!